Named data sources (from NVIDIA's EU AI Act training summary)
Named private datasets NVIDIA lists as obtained from third parties for Nemotron 3/3.5 (Section 2.2.2, separate from rightsholder licences; the summary does not say whether they were bought): Global Regulation; TAUS Translation Memory; Scale HLE; HackerRank Coding; Granary; SIFT-50M; Mercor (agentic terminal-task and agentic-search tool-use data); Turing Math Data Pack; Patronus (dialog memory data); "Droid Harness Pivot" data; "Chemistry Ether0" data[1]
Coverage
TorrentFreak, Jan 2026: amended complaint alleges a member of NVIDIA's data strategy team contacted Anna's Archive about acquiring its millions of pirated materials (reported)[3]
Watch for
Lawsuit: Nazemian et al. v. NVIDIA Corporation, No. 4:24-cv-01454 (N.D. Cal.), authors' proposed class action alleging use of their copyrighted works to train NeMo Megatron and other LLMs; court denied NVIDIA's motion to dismiss in part (per plaintiffs' law firm, May 2026) (reported)[4]
Allegation in amended complaint (reported Jan 2026): a member of NVIDIA's data strategy team contacted Anna's Archive, and NVIDIA sought to find out what 'high-speed access' to its data would look like; the complaint does not say whether NVIDIA paid. Anna's Archive later said on Reddit it never dealt with NVIDIA directly.[3]
Report (Proof News, Aug 2024): according to company Slack and internal documents, NVIDIA staff gathered YouTube videos for a new video model by downloading datasets of previously scraped videos and scraping their own; NVIDIA said it is confident its models and research comply with copyright law (reported)[5]